WSM — Williams-Sonoma, Inc.
Williams-Sonoma, Inc. (WSM) functions as a specialized, multi-channel retailer offering a diverse array of products for the home. Its flagship Williams Sonoma brand is renowned for cooking, dining, and entertaining essentials, such as cookware, culinary tools, small appliances, flatware, dinnerware, barware, outdoor furnishings, and an extensive collection of cookbooks.
Price chart & technical analysis
Loading chart…
As of 2026-09-13, WSM trades at $226.23 (market cap ~$26.6B), down 7.7% over the past month but up 25.7% over six months, with RSI at 42.83 and the price sitting 2.7% below its 20-day and 2.52% below its 50-day average while still 10.16% above its 200-day. Q2 FY2026 (reported 2026-08-26) produced the strongest comparable-brand growth in four years plus a raised full-year outlook, yet the shares have drifted lower since, leaving them at ~23x forward EPS versus a 15.79x five-year average.
The fundamental news flow is decisively positive: on 2026-08-26 WSM reported Q2 FY2026 revenue of $1.96B (+6.7% YoY) against ~$1.93B consensus, comparable brand revenue +6.2% (strongest in four years, positive across every brand), GAAP diluted EPS of $2.84 (+42%) and non-GAAP EPS of $2.10 vs $2.08 expected. Management raised FY2026 guidance to $8.17B-$8.37B of revenue (+4.7% to +7.2%) and +4% to +6.5% comps, and Wall Street responded with a wave of target increases (KeyBanc to $270, BofA to $263, RBC to $260, Morgan Stanley to $240; consensus target ~$246-$255 from a $190-$275 range). Tempering that: the stock has given back 7.72% over the past month and 0.52% over the past week as of 2026-09-13, RSI has cooled to 42.83, and the FMP analyst rating breakdown still skews cautious (18 buy / 32 hold / 6 sell, consensus 'Hold'), which looks like post-earnings digestion and multiple discipline rather than any deterioration in the story.
Revenue has genuinely inflected. Year-over-year growth by quarter: -4.3% in the quarter ended 2026-02-01 ($2.357B vs $2.462B), +4.4% in the quarter ended 2026-05-03 ($1.805B vs $1.730B), and +6.7% in the quarter ended 2026-08-02 ($1.960B vs $1.837B) - two consecutive quarters of acceleration, which the guidance raise corroborates. That is a turn, not a blip, though the trailing-twelve-month revenue base is only up ~2.2% ($8.005B vs $7.830B), so the recovery is young. Margins are the counterweight: reported Q2 FY2026 operating income of $448.8M implies a 22.9% operating margin, but management's non-GAAP operating margin was 17.3% versus 17.9% a year earlier, and the $2.84 GAAP vs $2.10 non-GAAP EPS gap (~$0.74/share) shows a meaningful one-off inside the headline quarter. On a like-for-like basis Q1 FY2026 operating margin was 16.2% vs 16.8% a year ago and Q3 FY2025 was 17.0% vs 17.8% - a consistent 60-80bp of annual compression, which management attributes to tariffs peaking in Q2 FY2026. Cash generation remains excellent: TTM free cash flow of $1.346B versus $1.028B a year earlier (flattered by the one-off), no long-term debt, $1.03B of cash and an accruals ratio of -3.66% (cash earnings running ahead of reported net income). Net: top line inflecting up, operating margin drifting down on tariffs, balance sheet and cash conversion pristine.
Expensive versus its own history and versus its growth rate. As of 2026-09-13 the shares at $226.23 carry a trailing P/E of 22.85 on $10.01 of TTM EPS, a PEG of 2.91, price/book of 12.44, price/sales of 3.33 and EV/EBITDA of 14.3x (closer to 15.1x adjusting the Q2 one-off out of the EBITDA base). Against a five-year average P/E of 15.79 and average P/S of 2.16, WSM is at a 45% premium on earnings and a 54% premium on sales relative to its own recent history. Forward math is worse, not better: consensus next-FY EPS of $9.509 sits below the $10.01 trailing figure because the one-off rolls off and tariffs bite, putting the forward P/E at ~23.8x - higher than trailing. The sole thing offering valuation support is cash yield: TTM FCF of $1.346B is a ~5.1% FCF yield, or ~4.7% normalized for the one-off, against a 1.24% dividend yield and a debt-free balance sheet. A 45-54% premium to its own multiple history for a business growing revenue mid-single-digits is a full price; the re-rating is defensible on permanently higher margins (~19% operating vs ~10-12% pre-2020) but leaves little cushion.
The market is paying roughly 24x forward earnings for a business guiding to 4.7-7.2% revenue growth - i.e. it is capitalizing management's claim that the 17-19% operating margin structure is permanent and that share gains in a fragmented home sector are durable. Two ways to read that. Bull case: the comp inflection is real, tariffs peak in Q2 FY2026 and lap out, the FY2027 EPS estimate currently sitting at $9.51 proves too low, and the multiple holds at 20-23x - in which case $226 is roughly fair and the recent 7.7% one-month drawdown is a buying opportunity. Bear case: the Q2 headline beat was one-off inflated ($2.84 GAAP vs $2.10 non-GAAP) and the underlying earnings engine actually grew only ~5%, so a market that starts valuing WSM on non-GAAP numbers at 20x would put fair value closer to $190-$200. The tell will be whether non-GAAP operating margin stops compressing at ~17% and whether the FY2027 EPS estimate starts to move up from $9.51 - if it stays anchored, the stock is priced for growth that hasn't shown up yet; if it lifts, the multiple is defensible.
Range-bound consolidation inside a longer uptrend. As of 2026-09-13, RSI(14) stood at 42.83 - neutral and leaning soft, but well short of oversold, so there is no mechanical buy signal here. The price is 2.7% below the 20-day SMA and 2.52% below the 50-day SMA, yet 10.16% above the 200-day SMA (which implies a 200-day level near $205). Return profile: -0.52% over one week, -7.72% over one month, +1.2% over three months, +25.69% over six months - a strong six-month advance now digesting. The 52-week range is $165.51-$254.89, so at $226.23 the stock sits roughly 11% below its high and 37% above its low. Implication: no urgency to chase. The actionable zone is a retest of the 200-day near ~$205, ideally with RSI in the low-to-mid 30s; a clean break and hold above $255 would signal the consolidation is resolved upward and would validate the analyst targets, but buying the middle of the range at a neutral RSI offers a poor entry-timing edge.
- Mortgage rates and the frozen existing-home-sales market: large-ticket furniture demand is tied to housing turnover, and the sector slump persists. WSM has been bucking it via affluent-customer resilience, but a sustained freeze caps the size of the comp recovery.
- Tariffs on imported home goods: management explicitly identified Q2 FY2026 as the peak period of merchandise-margin pressure. Whether that cost is priced through or absorbed determines whether the 17-19% operating margin band holds or erodes.
- Premium consumer health / K-shaped spending: WSM's core customer is affluent and has held up, but any labor-market softening or equity-market drawdown would hit discretionary big-ticket purchases quickly given the 1.46 beta.
- Interest-rate path and rate-cut expectations: an easing cycle would be a double tailwind - thawing housing turnover and supporting high-multiple consumer-discretionary names - while a hawkish repricing would pressure both the demand outlook and the multiple.
- Competitive intensity in home furnishings (RH, Arhaus, Wayfair, Amazon) and retail-sector rotation: WSM is being framed as a structural share gainer, but a promotional environment or import-price competition could reverse the comp trajectory it just established.
- Q3 FY2026 earnings, expected late November 2026 - the key test of whether the +6.2% comp and the raised $8.17B-$8.37B / +4%-6.5% comp guidance hold up, and whether non-GAAP operating margin stabilizes near 17% as tariff costs lap.
- Holiday Q4 sell-through and any further upward revision to FY2026 guidance or initial FY2027 framing.
- Fed rate cuts that unfreeze existing-home sales - the single biggest unlock for deferred big-ticket home-furnishing demand.
- Analyst estimate revisions: specifically whether the $9.509 next-FY EPS consensus starts to move higher after the guidance raise, which would mechanically lower the forward P/E.
- Continued capital returns funded out of $1.03B of cash, zero long-term debt and ~$1.35B of TTM free cash flow (1.24% dividend yield plus buybacks).
- Valuation risk is the first-order risk: 22.85x trailing and ~23.8x forward against a 15.79x five-year average and 2.91 PEG leaves no room for a miss - multiple compression alone could take 20-25% off the price without any change in the business.
- Tariff cost stickiness: management called Q2 the peak, but if landed-cost inflation persists past the lap, the margin structure that justifies the current multiple is what breaks.
- Housing cyclicality: with TTM revenue up only ~2.2% and the existing-home market still depressed, WSM is dependent on a macro thaw it does not control; a further leg down in housing would expose the comp recovery as narrow.
- Earnings quality optics: a $0.74 GAAP-versus-non-GAAP EPS gap in Q2 FY2026 means the headline 42% EPS growth and 22.9% reported operating margin materially overstate the underlying run-rate (~17.3% non-GAAP operating margin, ~5% underlying EPS growth). A market refocusing on adjusted numbers would re-rate the stock lower.
- High beta (1.46) and consumer-discretionary exposure: WSM will underperform sharply in any broad risk-off or recession scenario, and analyst targets are unusually dispersed ($190 low to $275 high), signalling genuine disagreement about fair value.
Williams-Sonoma is a genuinely high-quality retailer - 28.8% ROIC, no long-term debt, $1.03B of cash, negative accruals, ~47% gross margin and ~$1.35B of TTM free cash flow - and it just printed its strongest comps in four years with a raised outlook. But at $226.23 you are paying ~23.8x forward earnings and ~3.3x sales versus a 15.8x / 2.16x five-year average for a business growing revenue mid-single-digits and reporting operating-margin compression of 60-80bps a year on tariffs, with a one-off flattering the Q2 headline. Good business, full price: the risk/reward is not compelling here, and the better entry is a retest of the 200-day moving average near ~$205 (or below) with RSI in the 30s. I would want to see non-GAAP operating margin stop compressing and the $9.51 FY2027 EPS consensus start moving up before treating the current multiple as earned.
Blended two-method estimate as of 2026-09-13: 60% weight on 20.0x forward consensus EPS of $9.51 - a premium to the 15.79x five-year average justified by structurally higher margins (19%+ operating vs ~10-12% pre-2020) and 28.8% ROIC, but a discount to the current ~23.8x forward for housing cyclicality and tariff uncertainty - giving ~$190; plus 40% weight on normalized free cash flow of ~$1.26B (TTM $1.346B less roughly $90M of after-tax one-off benefit) capitalized at a 5.0% target FCF yield on 117.7M shares, giving ~$213. The 60/40 blend lands at ~$199, roughly 12% below the 2026-09-13 price of $226.23 and below the $246-$255 analyst consensus.
The 64.4 / 'Good Fundamentals' band is a fair description of the underlying business, and I would only shade it down modestly - not enough to change the band. Two things the formula cannot see argue for a slightly lower score: (1) the Q2 FY2026 quarter was one-off inflated (GAAP EPS $2.84 vs non-GAAP $2.10; reported 22.9% operating margin vs 17.3% non-GAAP), which flatters both the growth leg (via operating cash flow and net income) and the quality leg (via the 19.2% TTM operating margin), so the true run-rate is a touch weaker than the score implies; and (2) operating margin has compressed 60-80bps year-over-year in each of the last several quarters, which the trailing-margin trend legs capture only partially. I would put a normalized score nearer 58-60, still solidly 'Good Fundamentals' - a move of well under 10 points, hence Agree. I am deliberately not using the cyclical-trough escape hatch here: WSM is a housing-linked cyclical, but it is not at a depressed trough (TTM revenue +2.2%, ROIC 28.8%, margins near record highs), so the standard backward-looking penalty does not apply, and the score's own rich-valuation overlay (P/E and P/S well above five-year averages) is already flagged separately. Note also that the deterministic score contains no valuation input by design, so 'Good Fundamentals' should not be read as 'good stock at this price' - at ~23.8x forward the price is the problem, not the business.
AI-generated analysis for informational purposes only, not financial advice.